You are on the beta version of My Abandonware. The live site is still myabandonware.com. Your favorites and ratings here are copied to the live site. Comments and other changes are not — we delete them every morning at 08:00 Paris time, when this site goes down for about an hour. Leave feedback through this link to Pastel (email required).
The beta goes down at 08:00 Paris time, in a few minutes. We rebuild the database from the live site. It comes back in about an hour.
Ive been trying to get this game to work at a higher resolution using DGVOODOO2 does anyone know of another program or way to edit the resolution? Not sure if there is a ini. file
If it says that you need at least 60 MB of RAM or whatever: Right-click Setup.exe, go to Compatibility, tick "Run this program in compatibility mode for:" and choose Windows XP (Service Pack 2). Hit "Apply" and then run Autorun.exe.
1
NitroReoxMayhem20 Aug. 2022
as above
i managed to get lego creator running on windows 7..i usedDoubleAgent_x64x86 and WinCDEmu-4.1 to mount it although i haven't tested it on windows 10.... i hope this clears things up for this game i managed to burn this game with IMGBURN. i hope it'll work for you hard core harry potter gamers
1
isaac14 Jul. 2022
i need disk 2 to start the application
0
NitroReoxMayhem10 Aug. 2021
i managed to get lego creator running on windows 7..i usedDoubleAgent_x64x86 and WinCDEmu-4.1 to mount it although i haven't tested it on windows 10.... i hope this clears things up for this game
1
FUCKBOY16 Apr. 2021
TIME TO MAKE SOME REAL LEGO HARRY POTTER ERP
2
Gaymer9310 Mar. 2021
This is just a disc image, that is corrupted, as soon as you try to open it, so it is not a downloadable file, its just a waste of time, so just DONT bother very angry as its a game ive always wanted to play..
0
Arthurion16 Jan. 2020
Would be nice to add the original non-lego main HP games (at least the first 3, which are all we need), since they aren't sold anymore.
3
Syntax04 Jun. 2019
Seems to be corrupted for me, too.
0
Dave3333327 May. 2019
How's the game corrupt, just curious?
0
Andrew06 Jan. 2019
the game is corrupted.
4
mike32016 Nov. 2018
For some reason, it's corrupted for me.
3
GoAnimator10118 Jun. 2018
This game was pretty obscure for its time and ours. I played it when I was about 8 (2005) and it was fun. On a CRPG Addict GIMLET it rates:
1. Game world. It’s a very loose adaptation of its Harry Potter source material,but this is one of the rare cases where loose adaptation works in the game’s favor,because of the creative freedom offered you. It’s fun to build a cage and put a minifigure in it and watch it try to get out, or to put a lot of frogs/snakes/mice etc. in a small area. I also enjoy putting a minifigure in midair and watching it fall to its doom, or stacking several minifigures on top of each other and seeing how long they can walk around without falling off each other. But debatably the most fun I've had was blowing things up. I have no idea why they decided to give you dynamite bricks, but I'm glad they did. When blowing up Hagrid's hut gets boring, build another cage and put a minifigure inside and see if he can get out before the cage blows up. Or build a giant cage and put a lot of minifigures in it and blow it up. There are (almost) endless possibilities. Score:6.
2. Character creation/development. This is a weak area. You play as Harry Potter,Ron Weasley,or Hermione Granger in game 1. In the sequel you can control almost anything. I guess this counts as an improvement? Score:2.
3. NPC interaction. There isn’t a whole lot. There aren’t any dialogue options,because LEGO. Houses kind of determine interactivity:for example,Gryffindors will almost always avoid Slytherins. Score:2.
4. Encounters/foes. Very weak. The climactic boss of the first game isn’t even Quirrellmort,despite a promising cutscene:it’s a spider. The plot of the second game doesn’t even make it as far as the basilisk. Score:1.
5. Magic/combat. Fortunately,this area is stronger. There are six usable spells between the games:Lumos,Accio,a fireworks spell,Aguamenti,Expelliarmus,and a spell to absorb Polyjuice Potion into the body. They all work pretty well. Combat isn’t as much fun. The climactic spiders in the first game require only Lumos to get rid of. Score:3.
6. Equipment. Yet another weak area. Your wand,a spellbook found in the ‘Gryffindor Common Room’ world,another spellbook you can get from Quirrell,the invisibility cloak (game 2 only),and that’s it. Kudos for the invisibility cloak,however. Score:2.
7. Economy. There isn’t any,apart from gaining points. Score:1.
8. Quests. There are a few quests in the first game,but the unified story is only told through cutscenes,which you need to read the book or watch the movie to understand. The second game has a partial plotline,which stops with the taking of the Polyjuice Potion. I understand there was an intention to complete the story,probably cut because of budget and because this is a kid’s game. Score:3.
9. Graphics,sounds,and interface. The graphics are serviceable,and definitely have an early 2000s look about them. The sound is so-so,the incidental music a little better. The interface is clunky at times,but not a pain to handle. Score:3.
10. Gameplay. I think the best word to describe this is......replayable. A virtue of these game is their length:both of them can be completed in a few hours. And as I just said,their replay value is pretty high for a kid’s game. Score:5.
That gives us 28 points. Not bad at all.
-2
Luca12 May. 2018
Nice i love this game
1
No comment nor review for this game at the moment.
English 
German 
French 
Korean 
Swedish 
Comments and reviews
Hi, the game file for this game is corrupted. Sadly I do not know what you can do for it but.
Ignore my comment. WinCDEmu open's the disk just fine. Everything is wonderful!
English Iso will not open, simply gives error "The Disk Image is corrupted"
Swedish version provided :
https://archive.org/details/lego-creator-harry-potter-swe
Korean :
https://archive.org/details/lego-creator-harry-potter-windows-pc-kr-gnc-interactive-korean
Ive been trying to get this game to work at a higher resolution using DGVOODOO2 does anyone know of another program or way to edit the resolution? Not sure if there is a ini. file
Tutorial: Running LEGO Creator: Harry Potter on Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10: https://rockraidersunited.com/topic/8375-tutorial-running-lego-creator-harry-potter-on-windows-7-8-81-10/
If it says that you need at least 60 MB of RAM or whatever:
Right-click Setup.exe, go to Compatibility, tick "Run this program in compatibility mode for:" and choose Windows XP (Service Pack 2). Hit "Apply" and then run Autorun.exe.
as above
i managed to get lego creator running on windows 7..i usedDoubleAgent_x64x86
and
WinCDEmu-4.1 to mount it
although i haven't tested it on windows 10....
i hope this clears things up for this game
i managed to burn this game with IMGBURN.
i hope it'll work for you hard core harry potter gamers
i need disk 2 to start the application
i managed to get lego creator running on windows 7..i usedDoubleAgent_x64x86
and
WinCDEmu-4.1 to mount it
although i haven't tested it on windows 10....
i hope this clears things up for this game
TIME TO MAKE SOME REAL LEGO HARRY POTTER ERP
This is just a disc image, that is corrupted, as soon as you try to open it, so it is not a downloadable file, its just a waste of time, so just DONT bother very angry as its a game ive always wanted to play..
Would be nice to add the original non-lego main HP games (at least the first 3, which are all we need), since they aren't sold anymore.
Seems to be corrupted for me, too.
How's the game corrupt, just curious?
the game is corrupted.
For some reason, it's corrupted for me.
This game was pretty obscure for its time and ours. I played it when I was about 8 (2005) and it was fun. On a CRPG Addict GIMLET it rates:
1. Game world. It’s a very loose adaptation of its Harry Potter source material,but this is one of the rare cases where loose adaptation works in the game’s favor,because of the creative freedom offered you. It’s fun to build a cage and put a minifigure in it and watch it try to get out, or to put a lot of frogs/snakes/mice etc. in a small area. I also enjoy putting a minifigure in midair and watching it fall to its doom, or stacking several minifigures on top of each other and seeing how long they can walk around without falling off each other. But debatably the most fun I've had was blowing things up. I have no idea why they decided to give you dynamite bricks, but I'm glad they did. When blowing up Hagrid's hut gets boring, build another cage and put a minifigure inside and see if he can get out before the cage blows up. Or build a giant cage and put a lot of minifigures in it and blow it up. There are (almost) endless possibilities. Score:6.
2. Character creation/development. This is a weak area. You play as Harry Potter,Ron Weasley,or Hermione Granger in game 1. In the sequel you can control almost anything. I guess this counts as an improvement? Score:2.
3. NPC interaction. There isn’t a whole lot. There aren’t any dialogue options,because LEGO. Houses kind of determine interactivity:for example,Gryffindors will almost always avoid Slytherins. Score:2.
4. Encounters/foes. Very weak. The climactic boss of the first game isn’t even Quirrellmort,despite a promising cutscene:it’s a spider. The plot of the second game doesn’t even make it as far as the basilisk. Score:1.
5. Magic/combat. Fortunately,this area is stronger. There are six usable spells between the games:Lumos,Accio,a fireworks spell,Aguamenti,Expelliarmus,and a spell to absorb Polyjuice Potion into the body. They all work pretty well. Combat isn’t as much fun. The climactic spiders in the first game require only Lumos to get rid of. Score:3.
6. Equipment. Yet another weak area. Your wand,a spellbook found in the ‘Gryffindor Common Room’ world,another spellbook you can get from Quirrell,the invisibility cloak (game 2 only),and that’s it. Kudos for the invisibility cloak,however. Score:2.
7. Economy. There isn’t any,apart from gaining points. Score:1.
8. Quests. There are a few quests in the first game,but the unified story is only told through cutscenes,which you need to read the book or watch the movie to understand. The second game has a partial plotline,which stops with the taking of the Polyjuice Potion. I understand there was an intention to complete the story,probably cut because of budget and because this is a kid’s game. Score:3.
9. Graphics,sounds,and interface. The graphics are serviceable,and definitely have an early 2000s look about them. The sound is so-so,the incidental music a little better. The interface is clunky at times,but not a pain to handle. Score:3.
10. Gameplay. I think the best word to describe this is......replayable. A virtue of these game is their length:both of them can be completed in a few hours. And as I just said,their replay value is pretty high for a kid’s game. Score:5.
That gives us 28 points. Not bad at all.
Nice i love this game
No comment nor review for this game at the moment.